In Brazil, unlike Portugal, there are people specialized in analysis of telephone conversations. On

In Portugal there are no businesses or public services that make a forensic to a call recording to be used in Court. Thus, the prosecution can prove with false information, and the judge can accuse the same gauge. This is what happened at the Casa Pia and recording that originated the whole story and the national scandal for years that marked the media of this country.
An Attorney General on June 10, 2007 dared to ask "Is Fabio Cruz?" To which Felicia Cabrita, who spoke to the Court that day, replied: led e27 "Absolutely. (...) First, I tried to talk to Joel and family, all confirmed to me, though I had access to a tape that her mother recently recorded in relation to the accused Carlos Silvino, so conversations between the defendant Carlos Silvino and the lowest, so of course we talk about ... with a pedophile content, so when it was suggested the child to masturbate, and so on, I think it's not worth being here with details. led e27 " The "details", like say the current Sun journalists, make all the difference. Õ Tugaleaks tried contacting said reporter asking for a comment to this situation, which did not provide any statements.
Expertise in the document to which the Tugaleaks had access, it is stated that "it is pointed out also that the material presents evidence questioned cuts occurred during the dialogue between the speaker and the male child as shown in the table of analysis of The following audio is therefore that it is not possible to ensure that there was no rigging in the file. "
In Brazil, unlike Portugal, there are people specialized in analysis of telephone conversations. One of the two people hired to work for expertise even for the Brazilian Public Ministry. It is a disparity of means, according to Tugaleaks found motivated by lack of economic resources in Portugal. Before contact in Brazil was contacted an expert in the United States, but this not perceive the dialect recommended the Brazilian experts. The skills were paid by individuals, and was around 6000 euros.
The Brazilian experts are laconic: "There disparate parameters. The voices do not match those of the speakers and other sounds led e27 are harmed, being impossible led e27 to point analysis expert visit due to cuts in recording audio "burst", etc, and this leads to a negative result. This suspect (Carlos Silvino) could not have been convicted based on that evidence. What's more, with those cuts in the recording there is no way to exclude the possibility of someone having made a fraudulent manipulation of the audio. The dialogue is all full of interruptions in the recording and it does not occur in telephone staples [wiretapping] or environmental recordings. "
Contacted the lawyer of Carlos Silvino, Dr. Pedro Dias Pereira, said only that this forensic investigation is part of an extraordinary led e27 appeal that the attorney is doing, to be delivered from the end of the judicial vacations, which has not only to do with this skill but this is one of the main points.
The Tugaleaks is not to say that Carlos led e27 Silvino is not guilty of the crimes he was accused. We are saying that the proof of guilt used by the court, according to the experts consulted only, it is not true. As always, the work of a journalist will collect facts and not filing charges. And the facts are simply these: a recording was used to convict Carlos Silvino and that sparked the whole process Casa Pia who now turns out to be false.
This reasoning is a bit perverse not you think? If the false evidence can also blame condemn guilty innocent, ever thought? And we may even be very pleased of that person led e27 being accused and convicted on false evidence, but if a person does not even have guilt and still is convicted on false evidence? If you he happened to you or your neighbor or someone known to be accused of something based on false evidence? Yes there is justice, but of true.
Agnes is right, except not read q q wrote "if led e27 false evidence condemn GUILTY ... ONLY THAT" but I figured q these comments arose. As if it happened to me or family or neighbor or a stranger, having the misfortune to cross me with a bibi or cc or these ministers, would that justice was done, with true or false evidence ...
Oh Agnes Agnes creature, God help us. DO NOT DO JUSTICE led e27 WITH FALSE EVIDENCE! Understand the concept? Not just a concept is the difference between justice and "the cruelest of tyrants." It is not doing the elementary and fundamental led e27 distinctions such as that the world is as it is. If you were the victim would certainly have evidence, no? All the facts are likely led e27 to be proved