Mayor CEDEIRA not understand what happens garden lighting to the beach. Post for "dummies" | We CEDEIRA
As you know, runs around garden lighting a collection of books called "For Dummies" told to explain in a simple way the readers do not necessarily apaiolados, paspáns or silly, but inexperienced or principantes a chair. The post that follows will be focused for easy understanding even for a "dummy" any.
Explanation: We are a marine reserve of fishing interest "whose upper limits are set by the top line of the maximum high tide equinoctial" according to Decree 28/2009 of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (Doga 33/2009). (See photo at the bottom of this post). The slope or cliff made the sea, therefore, it reaches the sea there are always within the marine reserve of CEDEIRA. Lest you should say that the sea does not get up there, you have here a video: click here. Do not lie or manipulating ... This Decree adds "The creation of marine reserves for fisheries interest completely garden lighting fits this philosophy combining the protection of geographical areas for the management of resources in accordance with the rating category VI IUCN as well as Article 7 of the Code of Conduct for responsible fishing FAO, which advocates adopt ordering fisheries leading to conservation and sustainable use of long-term fisheries. In this sense, the interest of marine reserves fishing fit perfectly with the recommendations of the top international organizations. " The paragraph above (very long for a dummy), which clearly says -resumindo- we are talking about a Protected Natural Area, and therefore, according garden lighting to Law 21/2013 of Environmental Assessment, garden lighting any action in this area must undergo an environmental assessment ordinary ie: COMPLETE. When we are talking about a rule of law, is binding, (though, as this is for dummies garden lighting will not get another legislation also requires garden lighting previous studies, as common sense). So far understood everything, right? Conclusion: who-in addition to the Mayor Cedeira- it seems that "there is the basis for the complaint garden lighting LEGAL"? A recommendation ...: to speak lawyers specialists in public law not random. We have already consulted some, and did not hesitate and point to a very possible-even alleged, for imperative legal- criminal offense, not administrative. garden lighting Speak justice. Clearly? Okay :)
Explanation: Work in our possession a letter very recent (not yet published to shame others, but do not rule out), where WINERY asks the coast this information and the response that is being "very voluminous" and more excuses ... Showing you have a mad desire garden lighting to collaborate with the public. Proof of this is the "transparency" that come with acting: entérase opposition to this by the press. What a democracy we are living ( suffer?)! Nothing new. It represents the same "transparency" garden lighting with which Health told us last year that he would sanction the County (we have evidence, Ollin ...) not to put posters desaconsellando bathing garden lighting (required after four years of terrible water quality) and not only was penalty (which would pay the County-the pobo- not those responsible), garden lighting but even that made a measurements, "casualmentente" gave "all right," garden lighting to avoid being the fifth year is definitely prohibited the bathroom to fix the problem . We made a video last summer garden lighting which shows the poor quality of water, by the way, click here. Well, disjointed second statement, not to mention the obstacles of Costa when asked appointment, etc ... (we also have evidence, always have, that's the problem garden lighting ... for them).
Explanation: The view ho: Primero criticized the inaction of the City Council: right! Nothing to discuss, absolute truth. Inaction was full, so inversely proportional to the responsibilities that should fall on who should garden lighting govern it did. "Ahora garden lighting va that act respectfully oppose también" ... Stunning! It is respectful dredge funds a marine reserve? Knowing what has been done more times and was a fiasco, why is hell-bent on this nonsense? On the "Curious Case of trunks buried" we do not comment any technical, simply because our intellect does not reach to understand what they are ... after reading extensive biography foreign technical management dunes, garden lighting this "solution" does not find nowhere to ... . Possibly transcend science. Perhaps hive bendecidos and temporary help against on grounds of faith, which can only science, what we see in medios- all hours, so it can be "blessed trunks."
Consider a Cousin: with the money going to throw overboard this year, came to open a public contract,
As you know, runs around garden lighting a collection of books called "For Dummies" told to explain in a simple way the readers do not necessarily apaiolados, paspáns or silly, but inexperienced or principantes a chair. The post that follows will be focused for easy understanding even for a "dummy" any.
Explanation: We are a marine reserve of fishing interest "whose upper limits are set by the top line of the maximum high tide equinoctial" according to Decree 28/2009 of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (Doga 33/2009). (See photo at the bottom of this post). The slope or cliff made the sea, therefore, it reaches the sea there are always within the marine reserve of CEDEIRA. Lest you should say that the sea does not get up there, you have here a video: click here. Do not lie or manipulating ... This Decree adds "The creation of marine reserves for fisheries interest completely garden lighting fits this philosophy combining the protection of geographical areas for the management of resources in accordance with the rating category VI IUCN as well as Article 7 of the Code of Conduct for responsible fishing FAO, which advocates adopt ordering fisheries leading to conservation and sustainable use of long-term fisheries. In this sense, the interest of marine reserves fishing fit perfectly with the recommendations of the top international organizations. " The paragraph above (very long for a dummy), which clearly says -resumindo- we are talking about a Protected Natural Area, and therefore, according garden lighting to Law 21/2013 of Environmental Assessment, garden lighting any action in this area must undergo an environmental assessment ordinary ie: COMPLETE. When we are talking about a rule of law, is binding, (though, as this is for dummies garden lighting will not get another legislation also requires garden lighting previous studies, as common sense). So far understood everything, right? Conclusion: who-in addition to the Mayor Cedeira- it seems that "there is the basis for the complaint garden lighting LEGAL"? A recommendation ...: to speak lawyers specialists in public law not random. We have already consulted some, and did not hesitate and point to a very possible-even alleged, for imperative legal- criminal offense, not administrative. garden lighting Speak justice. Clearly? Okay :)
Explanation: Work in our possession a letter very recent (not yet published to shame others, but do not rule out), where WINERY asks the coast this information and the response that is being "very voluminous" and more excuses ... Showing you have a mad desire garden lighting to collaborate with the public. Proof of this is the "transparency" that come with acting: entérase opposition to this by the press. What a democracy we are living ( suffer?)! Nothing new. It represents the same "transparency" garden lighting with which Health told us last year that he would sanction the County (we have evidence, Ollin ...) not to put posters desaconsellando bathing garden lighting (required after four years of terrible water quality) and not only was penalty (which would pay the County-the pobo- not those responsible), garden lighting but even that made a measurements, "casualmentente" gave "all right," garden lighting to avoid being the fifth year is definitely prohibited the bathroom to fix the problem . We made a video last summer garden lighting which shows the poor quality of water, by the way, click here. Well, disjointed second statement, not to mention the obstacles of Costa when asked appointment, etc ... (we also have evidence, always have, that's the problem garden lighting ... for them).
Explanation: The view ho: Primero criticized the inaction of the City Council: right! Nothing to discuss, absolute truth. Inaction was full, so inversely proportional to the responsibilities that should fall on who should garden lighting govern it did. "Ahora garden lighting va that act respectfully oppose también" ... Stunning! It is respectful dredge funds a marine reserve? Knowing what has been done more times and was a fiasco, why is hell-bent on this nonsense? On the "Curious Case of trunks buried" we do not comment any technical, simply because our intellect does not reach to understand what they are ... after reading extensive biography foreign technical management dunes, garden lighting this "solution" does not find nowhere to ... . Possibly transcend science. Perhaps hive bendecidos and temporary help against on grounds of faith, which can only science, what we see in medios- all hours, so it can be "blessed trunks."
Consider a Cousin: with the money going to throw overboard this year, came to open a public contract,
No comments:
Post a Comment